Search for: "KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 421 - 440
of 485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
(Patently-O) Ninth Circuit affirms infringement finding against clothing maker: Quiksilver, Inc. v Kymsta Corp (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB affirms refusal to register, ruling DELI EXPRESS and SAN LUIS depicted ‘in such a manner that consumers would not perceive them as constituting a single composite mark’: In re E A Sween Company (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Extreme rareness of RENATI as surname leads to 2(e)(4) reversal: In re The House of Terrance Proprietary… [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:20 pm
A lot can be learned from the easily searched trademark registrations existing on the United States Patent and Trademark Office's online database. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
" State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
’” First United Bank v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
This morning’s papers across the United States are covered with paralyzed, former dancer, Stephanie Smith’s battle against food giant, Cargill. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Soto and United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 10:21 pm
Relying principally on United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
– FIFA IP victories (Afro-IP) Switzerland Heineken versus Keineken: trade mark parody in the Alps (Class 46) Syria Syria recognises unregistered trademarks (The IP Factor) Tanzania S26 baby food scare – possibly counterfeits (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Article in The Times regarding James Joyce’s heir’s agreement to new budget edition of Ulysses – revived copyright (1709 Copyright Blog) UK IPO:… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
See, Brothers v New York State Elec. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc v… [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:22 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 12:31 pm
" These Elizabethan poor laws became the model for the United State legislation on the same subject. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In State v. [read post]
