Search for: "Kays v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
Accountability requires that the accountable person is obliged to explain the state of affairs tohttp://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/shoesmith-v-ofsted-others-judgment-270511.pdfwhich it attaches. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am
Lord Justice Maurice Kay accepted that “the context – the protection of vulnerable children – is important and, together with a degree of urgency may impact on the requirement of procedural fairness“. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger MR, Maurice Kay and Stanley Burnton LJJ though the principal judgment was handed down by Maurice Kay LJ. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:59 am
" Krulewitch v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:43 am
The ENTREPRENEUR HALL OF FAME has inducted the likes of such well known entrepreneurs as Mary Kay Ash, Anita Roddick, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, among others. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:41 am
Kays v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
It was accepted that the decorations were in a poor, rather tatty state, although dreadful. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:50 am
Toki v Ipourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton (Case C-424/09); [2011] WLR (D) 128 “The mechanisms for the recognition of higher education diplomas pursuant to article 3(b) of Council Directive 89/48/EEC, as amended, were applicable where the profession at issue was a regulated professional activity within the meaning of the second sub-paragraph of article 1(d) of the Directive in the member state of origin, irrespective of whether the person concerned was or was… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:07 pm
Analysis:After a lengthy discussion of corporations, general partnerships and LLCs, the Court framed the principal issues on appeal as (1) whether Plaintiffs may assert individual claims against Kay and (2) whether Plaintiffs may bring derivative claims on behalf of the partnerships and LLCs against Kay.(1) Individual ClaimsApplying logic from Shenker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:12 am
First, it refuses to embrace the Perfect 10 v. ccBill conclusion that 230 preempts state IP claims, but it doesn't accept the alternative proposition (from the Project Playlist and Friendfinder cases) either. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
’” Kai Falkenberg: She is closely following the pending lawsuit Parisi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
