Search for: "Keen v. Keen" Results 421 - 440 of 1,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, William Watkins Jr. weighs in on Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:25 am
Monday’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:54 pm by NL
We would be very keen to see a transcript of the judgment in this case, if one exists. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 4:04 pm by charonqc
WIN or LOSE in tomorrow’s Ingerland v Germany game… we can always look on the Bright Side of Life. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:54 pm by NL
We would be very keen to see a transcript of the judgment in this case, if one exists. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
This is a confirmation of his earlier observations in Undre v London Borough of Harrow [2016] EWHC 931 (QB). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
He awaits the ruling with keen interest. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
[Venkat’s two cents: As a keen student of lawyer personal branding, I loved this case and post. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:52 am by Nick Dyson, Olswang LLP
The contributory rule and the rule in Cherry v Boultbee Neither the contributory rule nor the equitable rule in Cherry v Boultbee (1838) 2 Keen 319 applies in an administration so as to permit the administrator to refuse to admit a member’s proof of debt or to refuse to pay dividends on it on the grounds that, if the company went into liquidation, the member would or might become liable to calls under s 74(1) of the IA 1986. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:00 pm
  A point that's surely valid, but one that Justice Wiley is particularly keen to make. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen tries to “narrow down the prospects” for the cases, and Ernie Haffner suggests at his eponymous blog that the court could adopt “a middle ground position. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:50 pm
After Marshall v Bradford MC, it is vital for a .s85 application to revive tenancy by varying the possession order that the original possession order remain enforceable, particularly since the failure of the Payne approach in Porter v Shepherds Bush. [read post]
However, their lordships were keen to point out that the test is still ultimately subjective. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:01 pm by Brett Burlison
We would applaud even louder if they would fix Howell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
Now all that remains is for a ruling on whether the BBC is in breach of them.The IPKat, who is really keen on summary judgments where they can be given, welcomes this ruling. [read post]