Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 421 - 440 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2012, 10:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, writing for the Crime and Consequences Blog, agreed that because of the three-way split in the Court, Williams had left the state of Confrontation Clause law unclear. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
" At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger surmises that Justice Sotomayor, as evidenced by her questions in Tuesday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am by Nabiha Syed
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences looks at three habeas cases relisted for next week. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Rizo comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
Fisher, a habeas case involving a question of timing for federal habeas petitioners, for this blog; at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to Little’s post. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who maintains that “any genuine originalist will swiftly be declared ‘out of the mainstream’ by Senator Schumer, the New York Times, and the usual suspects. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 9:37 am
"More likely than not, the failure to enforce California's death penalty has already killed thousands of people," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the conservative Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Joshua Matz
Responding to criticism by Dahlia Lithwick and Lisa McElroy in the New York Times (which Kiera covered in Friday’s round-up), Kent Scheidegger countered at Crime and Consequences that “[u]nexplained denials are, of course, standard operating procedure at the discretionary review stage. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rachel Sachs
Kent Scheidegger at the Crime and Consequences Blog and Nick Wing at the Huffington Post both have coverage of Justice Thomas’s remarks during oral argument last week in Boyer v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has compiled the 20 amicus briefs urging the court to review City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:47 am
  Kent Scheidegger over at Crime and Consequences has a good, if slightly biased, post about the latter case. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:04 am by CJLF Staff
  CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger is quoted in the article, stating the recent challenges "seem to be accelerating the switch to pentobarbital," which is more readily available. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:10 pm
"I wouldn't place any wagers on any [scheduled executions] being carried out," says Kent Scheidegger, who closely follows death penalty issues at the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, Calif. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
”  And Kent Scheidegger discusses the issues in the case in a podcast for the Federalist Society. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes issue with the dissents from the decision to deny the stay by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor here and here, respectively. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Paul Cassell
Yesterday, along with Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, I filed an amicus brief for the Van Treese family and the Oklahoma District Attorneys Association. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
News) covered the stay, while Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
"This means further delay in an execution that is already very long overdue," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Nabiha Syed
  Other coverage comes from USA Today, the Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor, CNN, JURIST, AP, and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences; at ACSblog, Brandon Garrett compares the decision in Perry to the Court’s decision earlier this week in Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences points out a quip by Scalia that had the audience laughing at Monday's oral argument in Beard v. [read post]