Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am by Orin Kerr
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:06 am by Orin Kerr
Jones–A Case Of Sound And Fury Herding Katz: GPS Tracking And Society's Expectations Of Privacy In The 21st Century United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:14 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Supreme Court may answer that question in Ashcroft v. [read post]
Lady Hale and Lord Kerr both gave dissenting judgments (Lady Hale as to outcome, though she agreed with Lord Wilson on the relevant legal principles to be applied; Lord Kerr dissented both on outcome and on the legal approach taken, specifically on the relevant test to be applied by the courts when considering the proportionality of a measure; though both agreed with certain parts of Lord Wilson’s judgment). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am by Orin Kerr
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:44 am by Orin Kerr
Here’s the abstract: In the Supreme Court’s recent decision on GPS monitoring, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
  At Volokh, Orin Kerr has these fitting comments: The Sixth Circuit denied rehearing en banc,with the author of the original panel opinion stating that the original opinion was not only correct, but that it was "an easy case. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am by Liskow & Lewis
The district court had dismissed the case on the grounds that the auditor, who received relevant information from an employee of the State of Louisiana, was not the “original source” of the information on which the claim was based. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal has a very interesting article on the dispute among two plaintiff’s attorneys involved in Florence v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The inviolability of documents which are part of a mission archive under arts 24 and 27(2) of the VCDR makes it impermissible to use such documents (or copies) in a domestic court of the host country, absent extraordinary circumstances such as state security, or express waiver from the mission state. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On Monday, the Second Circuit handed down a very important decision on standing to challenge secret surveillance programs in Amnesty International USA v. [read post]