Search for: "Kirk v Kirk" Results 421 - 440 of 739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Marissa Miller
The petition of the day is: Title: Spectrum Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly
Kirk, which held that a relator in a False Claims Act case can’t rely on information obtained through FOIA to support their qui tam claim. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm by Richard Pildes
  The most important court decision on that question was handed down by the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:56 am by By Erik Lundegaard
LaShawnda Jackson shares what it's like having a mentor like Scott Kirk who's "always got my back. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
" Other footnotes omitted.The case is Robinson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:20 am by WSLL
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:48 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Tuesday brings 160 posts on The LexBlog Network with a couple highlights coming from class action attorneys Kirk Jenkins and Andrew Trask. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:37 am by Ed Wallis
Kirk, which “made it harder for whistle-blowers to hold government contractors accountable for fraud. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:27 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Civil Rights Duty to protect Kirk Dewindt appeals from the judgment of the circuit court that dismissed his action under 42 U.S.C.A. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Medicare-Glaser Corp., 605 N.E.2d 557, 559-61 (Ill. 1992) (applied to pharmacists); Kirk v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:12 am by Aaron Mensh
On May 16, 2011 the US Supreme Court resolved a split among federal circuits and ruled in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:02 am by Bexis
Medicare-Glaser Corp., 605 N.E.2d 557, 559-61 (Ill. 1992); Kirk v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:41 am by fraudfighters
On May 16, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]