Search for: "LITTLE v. ARKANSAS" Results 421 - 440 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 4:20 am by Gabe Acevedo
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
The ratio of 1.19-to-1 also fell easily within the range of generally accepted ratios that Arkansas courts approved in other punitive damages cases.As for comparable civil penalties, the Arkansaslittle FTC Act” imposed a $10,000 penalty for unconscionable trade practices and the Arkansas Civil Justice Reform Act, which was not in effect at the time this cause of action arose, limited punitive damages to $1 million in many circumstances, the court… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:37 am by Steven M. Gursten
An Arkansas jury slapped the auto insurance giant with a $21 million verdict for compensatory and punitive damages, and the Supreme Court of Arkansas upheld the verdict in Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:05 am by Ray Mullman
Arkansas Supreme Court issued a great opinion in the case of Stephen Toof Brown (in-house Farmers Insurance Company staff attorney) v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:40 am by Phil
The following is excerpted from a March 8, 2011 post at Antitrust Today: Patent holders seeking to settle patent infringement cases are breathing a little easier today as a result of yesterday's decision by the Supreme Court not to review the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
")Carly Simon - "Coming to Get You" ("Lovers and lawyers in Arkansas / Laid down the law. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:36 am by Antitrust Today
Patent holders seeking to settle patent infringement cases are breathing a little easier today as a result of yesterday’s decision by the Supreme Court not to review the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That little-mentioned but deeply held legal principle might be the true story behind M.J. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:25 am by Michele Thomas
Reviewed by Michele Thomas, Catalog & Reference Librarian at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:20 am
Justice Kagan took no part in the in the consideration or decision of the case. -- To discuss the case, we have University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:28 am by Susan Giusti
“Legislative and Judicial Dynamism in Arkansas: Poisson v. [read post]