Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER" Results 421 - 440 of 1,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 10:25 pm by Aaron Feigelson
It’s not an understatement to say that the NTP v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
 The purpose of the 2006 Act was specifically stated to lessen the “undue burden” trademark holders have with dilution claims. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Internet poses new challenges to trademark holders, but equitable jurisdiction cannot solve all their problems. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
Infront WM AG broadens a little the otherwise fairly restrictive rules on standing of individuals. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:36 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Since this case conflicts with a ruling from the Fourth Circuit, this case is a candidate for the Supreme Court.The case is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am by Eric
Unfortunately, the last sentence reminds me a little of the gratuitous dicta in Tiffany v. eBay about "willful blindness," which trademark plaintiffs have already started to mine. [read post]