Search for: "Lawrence S. Petit" Results 421 - 440 of 813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2013, 5:14 am
Sidenote: Walker Lawrence, one of the employment lawyers on my Twitter emplaw list, is on the Petition for Writ of Certiorari. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Lawrence County sheriff’s deputies said.Yeah, they were separate home invasions, but invasions of the same home! [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
At The Huffington Post,Fred Wertheimer discusses cert. petitions pending before the Court in two campaign finance cases – Danielczyk v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
   It’s the mistake of thinking that Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Balkinization has two posts from the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrences 10th Anniversaries at UCLA School of Law. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Against The Rector and former vestry of Bishop Seabury Church in Groton, CT; (Plaintiff was the Diocese of Connecticut; parish lost decision in trial court, and Connecticut Supreme Court recently affirmed that decision [302 Conn. 408, 28 A.3d 302]; parish’s petition to the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 8:17 am
Lawrence Nathaniel Jones, an employee of Valley Protein, pulled a gun and shot four co-workers, killing two, authorities said. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:54 pm by LAUREN PAULSON
  I saw Lawrence Lessig interviewed online. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:50 pm
Only the appellant's attorneys (the ones who filed the petition seeking review) may argue, but the appellees, their attorneys, and members of the general public may attend and listen to the proceedings. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Here is the full text of the Florida Supremen Court's opinion issued September 6, 2012. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
Most recently, on June 7, 2012, Eastern District of California Judge Lawrence O’Neill held that the defendant officers cannot rely on the statutorily codified business judgment rule under California Corporations Code Section 309, because the statute by its terms refers only to officers not directors Judge O’Neill’s ruling is discussed here (second item). [read post]