Search for: "Lawrence v. Texas"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
The last thing Bishop Lawrence's diocese wanted was to be seen as continuing as a member diocese of the apostate ECUSA. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 9:26 am
Texas, Romer v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Readers may be interested in this upcoming conference at UCLA School of Law: Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries, January 18-19, 2013. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
O'Scannlain addresses "the role Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
The Court will hear argument first in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:12 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:08 pm
The Immigration Judge terminated the proceedings, concluding that as a result of Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
Judge-made constitutional law said Paul in 2003, shortly after publication of the Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:58 pm
” [Senior:] I don’t know how, by your lights, [the Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
” And at the LGBTQ Policy Journal, Sophia Carrillo looks at the influence of the Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
In 2003 in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
Texas and, going even further, left some doubt whether Dougherty could be found to have violated the law as it now stands, by stating that "we offer no opinion on whether Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Casey) and, notably, Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 7:05 am
Texas (overturning Bowers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:20 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Finally, the author presents an alternative argument to that made by Professor Glazer: if the discriminatory application of the obscenity doctrine against gay sex portrayals were to become an issue, the demands of a principled and coherent jurisprudence would require the Court to revisit the doctrine, in light of Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
STUDY FINDS WIDE GAP IN ADVISER-CLIENT PERCEPTIONS ON FEE DISCLOSURE by Lawrence C. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
The American Constitution Society interviewed Paul Smith, counsel for the plaintiffs in the landmark Court case Lawrence v. [read post]
