Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers"
Results 421 - 440
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
The middle way between rule of reason and per se would allow claims if the plaintiff cites any of the factors the Supreme Court noted in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
De C.V. v. [read post]
Touch Trademarks and Tactile Brands With Mojo: Feeling the Strength of a Velvet, Turgid, Touch Mark?
12 Jul 2009, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court has indicated in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office) China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 8:58 pm
The case cite is Design Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
"June 25, 2009 - 2 PM: Otto International, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:11 pm
General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) was implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:28 am
Maryland has amended its antitrust law to make resale price maintenance agreements per se illegal, thus overruling Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 8:49 am
The new pricing law essentially restores the law regarding minimum resale pricing to how it existed prior to the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
In Gill v Bucholtz, the Court held that the B.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) had been overruled by a recent decision of the Supreme Court, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
They're less descriptive, but either name would look really keen on the back of a leather jacket.Other suggestions, genuine or fanciful, anyone? [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:00 am
In Blakney v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:56 am
Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007) and Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007), and Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 5:39 pm
Central Leather Co., 246 U. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Conference on RPM - On December 4, a conference was held in Washington, D.C. on the topic of resale price maintenance ("RPM") by consumer advocates, regulators, and policy experts opposed to RPM.Minimum RPM has emerged as a hot topic in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
As this blog has discussed previously, the law surrounding resale price maintenance has been unclear ever since the Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
