Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 421 - 440
of 672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
Readers can check the Proceedings out for themselves here on this handsome pdf; they can peruse the contents at their leisure, or go on word-searches for their favourite topics. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
Although he's described as a speaker, along with Lorna Woods, Dan Wilsher and Jonathan Griffiths, he's just going to be giving a few thoughts on the commercial impact of next week's ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Joined Cases C-403/08 FA Premier League and others v QC Leisure and C-329/08 Murphy v Media Protection Services. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:44 am
He immediately faced a huge legal challenge for the company: A verdict from 2660 Woodley Road Joint Venture et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:44 am
He immediately faced a huge legal challenge for the company: A verdict from 2660 Woodley Road Joint Venture et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:16 am
Patent No. 7,878,909 entitled PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES FOR OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT OF CASINO, LEISURE AND HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY and owned by Ameranth. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:16 am
Patent No. 7,878,909 entitled PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES FOR OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT OF CASINO, LEISURE AND HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY and owned by Ameranth. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:18 am
" BIC Leisure Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:48 am
It contained over 1200 flats, together with leisure facilities. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:48 am
It contained over 1200 flats, together with leisure facilities. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
Justice Markandey KatjuSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Mathai @ Joby Vs. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:03 am
Lodha Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in M/s Shiv Cotex v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:28 am
Turns out that’s not necessarily so – at least according to the Second Circuit’s recent decision in a Zyprexa case, Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
” If you get into issues with the SCA, it would behoove you to read Crispin v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 9:21 pm
.'s Metromedia requirements. t.co/DBE3x51 B-SDNY, post-Marshall, requires change to term of confirmed plan requiring claims ag. ex-D&Os be brought in BK Ct only. t.co/DBE3x51 B-SDNY notes as an aside that it has sustained objections to broad plan releases for former D&Os in 4 identified areas. t.co/DBE3x51 B-SC interprets when "cause" exists under §363(k) to grant or deny a disputed lender the right to credit bid in a sale. http://t.co/zXNGkks … [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Group v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Group v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
However, final judgement on both issues should await the decision of the ECJ in Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
In today’s case (Olianka v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:18 pm
The Illinois wrongful death lawsuit of Estate of Barnabe Lucas, deceased minor v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:35 am
; subject to anything the Court of Justice might say to the contrary in its keenly-awaited ruling in Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure [Advocate General's Opinion this February noted briefly here, with links], TVC had reproduced a substantial part of the films in its buffers (which could in theory hold up to 8 seconds worth of video streaming) and on screen; provisionally, the reproduction in the buffers and on the screens was not a… [read post]
