Search for: "Little v. Ives"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
By regulation, those classes of works are (i) motion pictures; (ii) sound recordings; (iii) musical compositions; (iv) literary works being prepared for publication in book form; (v) computer programs (including videogames); and (vi) advertising or marketing photos. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm
The reason for the move gives rise to much speculation (see, for example, and a passionate defence from Indigenous leaders (“The cabinet shuffle says little about Jody Wilson-Raybould — and plenty about the government“). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Pix Credit: No Attention Paid on Human Rights When Implementing Economic Reforms! [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Part IV concludes with the background of Hathcockfrom an insider’s perspective and an argument for why other states should apply the Michigan Supreme Court’s reasoning. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Victims are left with little trust in the system, but want lawmakers to address and fix this problem. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
For example, Robert Wood Johnson IV—the ambassador to the United Kingdom—co-owns the New York Jets. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
It builds up tension (I-IV-V) and then Resolves it (V-I). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm
Ebsworth Seyfarth Synopsis: On January 18, 2019, in Porath v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
§115(d)(4)(E)(iv)] No more than once every three years, the Collective may audit the records of a digital music provider to verify the accuracy of its royalty payments for the preceding three years. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
Bill 249 held that: Beginning July 1, 2017, dispensers are required to enter prescription information for schedule II, III, IV, V controlled substances within 24 hours. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
(The test for evaluation of facts, though, whether by AI judges, AI judicial staff attorneys, or AI jurors, would be different; I discuss that in Part IV.) [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
This is such a high-traffic area that I’ll have to be a little summary in describing the cases. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
Again, the question that came to me in that one, was at what point in research into the potential use of a new product, or new use of an old product, can you stake out your monopoly, under cover of which you can then raise funds to carry out further research.Although the court in this case [Warner Lambert v Actavis], was divided 3 to 2, I think there was very little between them. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Some programs include considerable public input and participation, others very little. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
It's normal that people don't remember every little thing that happened in [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 (1971) respectively; the latter decision was a little more than a month before New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
According to Harold Green’s daughter, the purpose of the UBS account was, as follows: As you know, ever since you have been a little girl, I have taught you that we need to have a safe haven because I am Jewish. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Marr v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
As in Forby v. [read post]