Search for: "MALEE v DISTRICT COURT"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama,In addition to the monetary settlement, the companies have agreed to revise their training and employment practices and will educate their employees about their rights (and responsibilities) under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “Under Title VII, employers must provide a workplace free from severe or pervasive sexual harassment …. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
Suit was filed this week in an Ohio federal district court challenging a school district's rule change that allows transgender students to use restrooms and locker rooms that conform to their gender identity. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of Colorado (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of New York, seeking monetary and injunctive relief (enjoining the continuation of such discriminatory practices).In a written statement announcing the settlement, EEOC’s Jeffrey Burstein, regional attorney for the New York District Office, noted, “The EEOC appreciates Corning’s willingness to make critical changes to its line lead hiring process, changes that we believe will lead to the advancement of… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, (EEOC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of New York, Buffalo Division. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama,In addition to the monetary settlement, the companies have agreed to revise their training and employment practices and will educate their employees about their rights (and responsibilities) under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “Under Title VII, employers must provide a workplace free from severe or pervasive sexual harassment …. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, and in addition to monetary damages, the agency secured a consent order wherein the company agreed to modify its employment policies and practices, and will conduct mandatory sex-discrimination training.In a written statement, Robert A. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:00 am
”Because such conduct allegedly violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division (EEOC v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to paying $50,000 to the impacted individual, the company has agreed to modify its employment related policies and practices and will provide appropriate in-person sexual harassment training to its employees, managers, and human resources personnel.In a written statement,EEOC Birmingham district director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “In short,… [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the only civil review grant from last week’s conference, the California Supreme Court agreed to review the Third District’s decision in Larkin v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:25 pm
Tatum v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:34 am
The court also dismissed his ADEA claim, finding that he did not allege that he actually applied for the job openings at issue (Blasi v Pen Argyl Area School District, December 5, 2013, Stengel, L). [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:28 am
He filed suit and the district court granted summary judgment against his sex discrimination and retaliation claims under the MHRA. [read post]
4 May 2018, 3:24 pm
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In an Equal Pay Act collective action lawsuit brought by female school crossing guards against the City of New York, who alleged they were paid less than male traffic enforcement agents, a federal district court in New York recently granted the City of New York’s motion for summary judgment, finding that significant differences between the two positions warranted the pay differential. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:35 am
The District Court denied this motion. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:06 pm
R.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
No. 2:12cr30-MEF, United States District Court, M.D. [read post]
