Search for: "MARKS v. STATE" Results 421 - 440 of 21,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:52 pm
Additionally, the benefit to the state from this legislation is likely less than in ACLU v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Ct.): Nichols Brief Here is the motion to dismiss in a case involving a Creek reservation crime where the defendant marked “I” on the racial identity box, State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:22 am
The court's press release states that there was no likelihood of confusion between both parties trade marks. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:57 pm
In Miss World Ltd v Channel 4, a judgment delivered on 16 April, Pumfrey J ruled on the conditions under which interim relief should be refused in a trade mark case on free speech grounds under s.12 of the Human Rights Act.The proprietor of the MISS WORLD trade mark (of the beauty pageant fame) objected to Channel 4 entitling a programme which followed the fortunes of competitors in a Thai transvestite and transsexual beauty contest… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:30 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Search and Seizure Warrantless entry; consent Mark Miller appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant as a third offense. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
 See Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. [read post]