Search for: "MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2022, 11:30 pm
Oral arguments in Kligler are on March 9, 2022.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:31 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has finally answered that question. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Massachusetts, 70 Buffalo Law Review __ (2022). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:47 pm
Based on the Supreme Court’s ruling, we could see a variety of potential outcomes, ranging from entirely enjoining the mandate in all states and territories to lifting the injunction for the remaining 25 states. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
In that case, the highest court in Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court, decided in that case that landowners must keep their properties reasonably clear of snow and ice. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
In that case, the highest court in Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court, decided in that case that landowners must keep their properties reasonably clear of snow and ice. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 2:22 am
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Will Decide. appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Dowd On December 13, 2021, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) considered whether the so-called “ABC Test” set forth in M.G.L.c. 149, §148B (“Section 148B”) should be applied to determine whether an entity is … Continue reading → [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 9:07 am
Last week, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (“SJC”) unanimously ruled that the state Personnel Records Law, M.G.L. c. 149, § 52C, provides for a public policy exception to employment at will. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 8:30 am
On December 13, 2021, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued its long-awaited decision determining that the Massachusetts Independent Contractor Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 148B (“Independent Contractor Statute”), which establishes the three-pronged “ABC” test used to classify workers as independent contractors or employees – and provides for a rebuttable presumption that workers are… [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:42 am
A sanction from the United States Patent and Trademark Office drew reciprocal disbarment by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court The respondent, Morton Chirnomas, is an attorney duly admitted to the Bar of the Commonwealth on August 14, 2003. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 8:33 am
On Friday the Supreme Judicial Court handed employees a decisive victory, holding in Meehan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
(There is a deep split on the subject among federal and state appellate courts, and the Supreme Court's 2015 U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:36 am
By: Alison Silveira and Barry Miller Seyfarth Synopsis: The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court answered longstanding questions about which entities may be jointly responsible for wage violations under Massachusetts law, and in so doing, highlighted the perils for employees of joining a federal collective action and failing to assert any related state law claims in that proceeding. [read post]
