Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 421 - 440
of 20,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
DorfAt his impromptu press conference after meeting with congressional leaders yesterday, President Biden said that he's "thinking about" Section 4 of the 14th Amendment as a Plan B in the event that no legislation raises or suspends the debt ceiling in the next few weeks, adding that he had come to that view because of the view recently expressed by Prof Laurence Tribe, who has long advised him on constitutional matters. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:30 am
B-10 to B-14. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
As a general matter, in the Rule 60(b) context, evidentiary hearings should be held to decide disputes concerning “material issues of fact. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
As a general matter, in the Rule 60(b) context, evidentiary hearings should be held to decide disputes concerning “material issues of fact. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
I for one am happy to see that T 307/03 (where the Board held that a double patenting objection can be raised also where there is only an overlap of the subject matter claimed in distinct applications) appears to be more and more isolated. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
The plaintiffs thus moved, under Rule 60(b), to have the judgment vacated and have the whole matter remanded for a new trial. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
” (emphasis added by the board).[2.2.4] It follows from this that the appeal proceedings are confined to the subject-matter of the first instance proceedings and therefore that the statement of grounds of appeal should at least discuss this subject-matter. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:59 pm
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:22 pm
Why hasn’t this occurred? [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:46 am
§ 541.202(b). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
T 861/93 [5-6] and T 28/93 [4.1]). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:01 pm
T 1685/07).Therefore, in the present circumstances of this case, the Board did not see any incentive not to admit this request when exercising its discretion pursuant to Article 13(1) RPBA. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
Since it wasn’t, res judicata prevents the use of Civ.R.60(B) as a substitute to collaterally attack the judgment. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 3:02 am
Attorney General Michael B. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:44 pm
The Second Circuit wrote something like that when it ruled on April 25 that Artist A’s reaping in Artist B’s garden, where Artist A had not sown, counted, as a matter of law, as “fair use” under the Copyright Act of 1976. [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:13 am
With that out of the way, you will recall that I have been a skeptic that shareholder activism is (a) a good thing and (b) likely to matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 8:20 am
While the limitations of Rule 1.7(a)(2) likely don’t apply, it is safer to discuss the potential for conflicts with both the client and potential client and have them execute the written consent provided in Rule 1.7(b)(4). [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 2:13 am
Rule 137(5) EPC is therefore not contravened.This is in line with the reasoning of the decisions of the Boards of Appeal T 507/11 (see Reasons 1.1 to 1.3), T 1285/11 (see Reason 2), T 1981/12 (see Reasons 4.1 to 4.5), and T 998/14 (see Reasons 1.1 to 1.3) dealing with similar circumstances. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:02 pm
No client cares: (a) what you're thinking, (b) what you did, or (c) what you know. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 10:02 pm
No client cares: (a) what you're thinking, (b) what you did, or (c) what you know. [read post]
