Search for: "MATTER OF E K D K"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2017, 1:44 pm
Separate Property of Each PartyThe parties wish to identify what will remain the separate property of each party during the domestic partnership, and to determine their rights in the event of a separation or dissolution of their domestic partnership, as hereinafter discussed.The following shall constitute and remain the “separate property” of the respective parties: (a) property, whether real or personal, and whether vested, contingent, or inchoate, belonging to or acquired by a party… [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
In years of working on use-of-force issues on Capitol Hill, I’d never heard anyone refer to the pact. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
When the State’s highest court ponders the weighty matter of whether a contract is required to entitle an attorney to an enforceable fee, and how the reasonableness of the fees is to be measured and determined, the average Lone State denizen’s interest are very much at stake too. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Cobb, Jr., Lindsey K. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:05 am
Huq, Judging Discriminatory Intent, (Cornell Law Review, Vol. 103 (2017)).William E. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 7:30 pm
CIK=0001411991&action=getcompanySearch the Next-Generation EDGAR SystemFiling DetailSEC Home » Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System » Company Search » Current PageForm 8-K - Current report:SEC Accession No. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
DILL, TROUBH HEISLER.JANE C FORRESTER WINNE, Plaintiff, represented by WILLIAM K. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
It doesn’t matter if you’ve formed a corporation or an LLC. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Beyer’s work with John K. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 8:54 am
About The Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER™ Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health Care”… [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 2:34 pm
About The Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER™ Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health Care”… [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Turk and Karen E. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Teno, Rebecca Anhang Price, and Lena K. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Hua Zhang.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 153 [week ending Sunday 25 June] | US Supreme Court holds provision preventing registration of disparaging trade marks unconstitutional | Wolfing down those veggies: it's a matter of the right descriptive term | A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision | Life as an IP lawyer | Former Constitutional Court judge weighs in on UPC ratification suspension | AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that a red… [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:18 pm
Review of Research in Education, 3, 1, 3-42.↩ [3]Cassirer, E. (1946). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
It then reminds its readers that the orders to follow will not end the matter: the Memo represents merely an initial action; there is likely more to come.Section 2 then speaks to "policy" and Section 3 to "implementation. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
As a threshold matter, the Supreme Court has recognized that plaintiffs are required to “demonstrate standing separately for each form of relief sought. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
-Corpus Christi 1978, writ ref'd n.r.e.)). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
D-1-GN-10-003483, Honorable Tim Sulak, Judge Presiding. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
After T 910/03 it languished but occasionally reappeared.The Board refrains from referring the matter to the EBoA as it considers such referral not to be decisive in the present case, since according to the Board a same conclusion would be reached using both the essentiality test and the gold standard (being that the removal violates Art. 76(1) EPC).Entscheidungsgründe(...)2. [read post]
