Search for: "MATTER OF J W" Results 421 - 440 of 2,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Court granted the emergency stay applications pending the disposition of the matters before the Sixth Circuit and the applicants’ petitions for writs of certiorari if such writs are timely sought. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Liberals said that they would leave the country if George W. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 12:05 pm
  I have been lucky enough to be able to teach one of the core courses in the Penn State School of International Affairs. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
.'s abysmal maternal and infant mortality rates"; David Karol (University of Maryland, College Park), "Abortion will remain a national issue no matter what the Supreme Court does"; Bruce W. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:07 am by Gibbons P.C.
Gibbons P.C. is pleased to announce that firm Directors Frederick W. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
We do not think it can fairly be argued that Lieven J’s conclusion, in the unusual circumstances of this case, was wrong. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:05 am by David Priess
Trump largely listened, adding only a few “big picture” questions, while Flynn actively questioned the briefers—mostly on tactical matters within the Middle East. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm by Unknown
(E) A test of the hearing and eyesight of the applicant, and of other matters that may be necessary to determine the applicant’s mental and physical fitness to operate a motor vehicle upon the highways, and whether any grounds exist for refusal of a license under this code. (2) (A) Before a class A or class B driver’s license, or class C driver’s license with a commercial endorsement, may be issued or renewed, the applicant shall have in his or her driver record a valid… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
” The court explained that Biden was not constitutionally obligated to honor Trump’s assertion of executive privilege and it would be inappropriate for the court “to intrude upon the executive function” by second guessing Biden’s determination of executive branch interests in the matter. [read post]