Search for: "MATTER OF K B"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2011, 9:04 pm
Subject areas might include (a) History and Theory of International Law, (b) Law of Armed Conflict (IHL), (c) International Organizations, (d) Dispute Settlement, (e) Law of the Sea, (f) Law of Environment, (g) Human Rights, (h) International Criminal Law, (i) Law of Development, (j) International Economic Law, (k) Private International Law (Conflict of Laws). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:28 pm
The director, K. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
” in which “Anlage B” had allegedly been generated in May 1993 this document has to be left out of consideration, since this document has been regarded as late filed and has therefore not been admitted in the present appeal proceedings. [5.9] In the annex to the summons to OPs dated 13 May 2011, the board had already indicated that according to its preliminary opinion the documents filed with the [opponent’s] letter dated 9 March 2010 (inter alia “Anlage… [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 5:23 am
E otro miembronan di direktiva ta Margaret Hawthorne (kònsùl general pa Merka) komo visepresidente, Jan Van Belleghem (kònsùl honorario pa Bélgika) komo tesorero, Ralph Obersi (kònsùl honorario pa Mèksiko) komo sekretario i Paul Pradin (kònsùl honorario pa Fransia) komo miembro. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
As a matter of fact, a comparative trial is also relevant if it shows that the alleged effect has its origin in the feature(s) distinguishing the invention from the closest prior art (see T 197/86 [6.3]). [read post]
Important Changes in South Carolina's Appellate Court Rules, Rules of Civil Procedure, and ADR Rules
29 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
Please contact counsel with any questions you may have regarding this matter. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the patent prohibition of R 28(d) which concerns processes for modifying the genetic identity of animals cannot be applied directly in respect of the subject-matter of claims 8 to 10. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
On April 19, 2012, ALJ Robert K. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
G 1/93 [headnote 2] indicates a last possible way out:“A feature which has not been disclosed in the application as filed but which has been added to the application during examination and which, without providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, merely limits the protection conferred by the patent as granted by excluding protection for part of the subject-matter of the claimed invention as covered by the application as filed, is not to… [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
A pencil sharpener approximating more closely to the subject-matter of Claim 1 has not been found. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
The lack of inventive step described above concerns the alternative where the B-replier is a man. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Hence, as regards clarity, for each chemical substance, the question arises as to which of these formulations of definition can unambiguously define the sought-for subject-matter and how the claim should enable the claimed subject-matter to be distinguished from the prior art. [4.6] Product-by-process claims fulfil the need of defining chemical substances (such as macromolecules, complex compositions), which cannot be defined by their structure but, by way of the process of their… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
It follows from the above considerations that the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request lacks the requirements of A 54(1) and (2) EPC 1973 in the light of the disclosure of D4. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The situation referred to at point [4.2] above applies to this claim in that it includes additional features which were not part of the claims as originally filed and which give rise to the question of whether or not an additional search as provided for in the Guidelines, B-II 4.2(i) and C-VI, 5.2(ii) and 8.2, is required in order to be able to examine the question of whether or not the claimed subject-matter meets the requirements of the EPC, in particular A 52(1) in combination… [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:11 pm
P. 54(b).First, the court concludes that the non-diverse interveners did not divest the federal court of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
(b) No evidence whatsoever that “Index X” was common general knowledge in the field of photo-catalysis or had already been disclosed or used has ever been offered either. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
In light of this guidance, 401(k) sponsors, including those sponsoring 401(k) safe harbor plans, should ensure that their plans are timely amended to comply with the post-Windsor rules. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
[VI] […] In dividing the claim into technical and non-technical features the ED merely followed the standard examination technique for subject-matter referring to an aim to be achieved in a non-technical field (see T 641/00 'Comvik'). [1.3.1] The ED was free to start out from a (notorious) general-purpose computer system. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
The subject-matter of claim 1 is not restricted to a specific method of applying the vital dye. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 9:25 am
Knox WR B. [read post]
