Search for: "MCCOY v. MCCOY."
Results 421 - 440
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
McCoy, 100 N.C. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Harbison or McCoy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am
More specifically, the continuous representation doctrine “applies only where there is ‘a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d at 784, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on McCoy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States: Standard for the court of appeals to correct a plain error; McCoy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:08 am
Because crocheting is so Lochner v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:19 am
A sample, from Washington v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:40 am
It's written by Brad Heath and Kevin McCoy. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Asset forfeiture was a component of U.S.A. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:43 pm
McCoy. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
The doctrine tolls the limitations period "where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim" (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306), and " where the continuing representation pertains specifically to [*2][that] matter' " (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d 1512, 1513, quoting Shumsky v Eisenstein,… [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
"McCoy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
On December 1, in Perez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
McCoy Hilliard & Parks, 346 N.C. 650, 660, 488 S.E.2d 215, 220-21 (1997). [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
See, e.g., Tibor, 1999 ND 150, ¶ 26, 598 NW.2d 480 ("modern transportation reduces the measure of distance from days to hours, and instant communication is available through phone and cable links"); McCoy v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages ***” ( Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Cox, 93 AD3d 639, 640 [2d Dept 2012]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295… [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
The complaint alleges that Singer and his firm breached their duty towards their client David by failing to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by attorneys, causing plaintiff to lose his case and/or to incur damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302 [2002]). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
In order to recover damages in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must establish "that the attorney 'failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, [*3]Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
