Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 421 - 440 of 4,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Before long, an insane amount of music had flooded the internet, most of it bad or boring. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright On 8 June 2022, judgment was handed down in Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 6:06 am by Eric Goldman
It’s a shame a “troll” got the benefit of this ruling. * SA Music LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm by Richard Hunt
” Plaintiffs state that they live near their respective Defendants’ stores and have been customers “on prior occasions. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:05 pm by NARF
Burgum, and The Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation (Voting Rights - Redistricting) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html In the Interest of A.H. and B.H., Children. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
And then I was fortunate enough with an inquiring mind and got on the cusp of an EdD, to get recruited to Ithaca, actually to work on the academic side where I coordinated their sports music program for about 20 years. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:49 pm by Bill Marler
Discharged home after negative stool culture despite low platelet count with diagnosis of infectious colitis v. inflammatory bowel disease. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]