Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 421 - 440
of 896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm
Development and implementation of an accompanying communication strategy; V. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
Unlike the Soviet Union, whose main allies were failed communist states with stagnant economies and little or no influence on the governance architecture, China’s allies are set to become some of the largest global economies in the near future (see HERE). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm
For a bill of this magnitude, not getting the score before the vote was highly unorthodox .In King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
The Secretary of State, Karen Bradley, has written to the company [pdf] indicating that she is “minded” to issue a European Intervention Notice. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
Politico writes that this would be a major gift from Trump to Netanyahu, who faces pressure from right-wing rival Education Minister Naftali Bennett to avoid using the phrase “two-state solution,” and that the main point of discussion instead will be Iran. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
(For an overview of the designation process, see this 2010 testimony by then-Deputy Assistant Secretary Glaser.) [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:08 am
The landmark decision in DeLuna v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm
Kennedy also abolished the OCB, instead relying heavily on the newly-created and more informal NSC Executive Committee—composed of the President; Vice President; Secretaries of State, Defense, and Treasury; Attorney General; Director of Central Intelligence; Under Secretary of State; Deputy Secretary of Defense; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the National Security Advisor. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
One of the main criticisms made about IMPRESS relates to its funding. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
One of the main criticisms made about IMPRESS relates to its funding. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
