Search for: "Maker v. Maker"
Results 421 - 440
of 7,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am
T.I. and Tiny alleged misappropriation by the doll maker of the group’s name and likeness, trade dress infringement, and unfair competition, seeking economic damages and an order blocking further sale of the dolls. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary Symposium How constitutions work and can be made to work better is the fundamental question of constitutional theory. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
The proposed Order Competition Rule would require that, before most individual investors’ orders could be executed by a trading center that does not facilitate order-by-order competition (like wholesaler market makers), those orders must first be exposed to a qualifying order-by-order auction in which both market makers and institutional investors can participate. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lebanon County Employees’ Retirement Fund, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:44 pm
Strong Arm Productions USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
Finally, we have Green v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 3:54 am
Again, your vote will be much appreciated, provided that you feel the article provided a useful summary of the Fifth Circuit panel opinion in Continental v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:35 am
"As the letter notes, the Statement of Objections (SO) in the Spotify case is "nearly two years old" (it came down right before the Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:08 am
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:57 am
” For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:44 am
There is also the possibility of another DOJ v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm
In a series of decisions and most explicitly in West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:18 pm
Beltran, Hannah Bensen, Amy Kvien, Erin McDevitt, Monica V. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:21 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
