Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 421 - 440
of 5,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
These marks related to (a) the word POLO; (b) pictorial devices of single polo players, each astride a pony engaged in play and (c) pictorial devices of two polo ponies, each with polo players astride them engaged in play. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:18 am
Moreover, a cancelled registration is not entitled to any of the presumptions of Section 7(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
The case reference is Christian Louboutin and Christian Louboutin SAS v Van Haren Schoenen BV, C-163/16.More specifically, the Dutch court is asking the CJEU to answer this question:“Is the notion of ‘shape’ within the meaning of Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive C (‘Form’, ‘vorm’ and ‘forme’ in the German, Dutch and French language versions of the Trade Marks Directive respectively) limited to the… [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 9:31 am
Both trade marks concerned identical goods. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
A grey marketCan grey markets be considered akin to trade in counterfeit goods, at least when it comes to the application of criminal provisions in trade mark law? [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
Paranova, C-427/93, C-429/93 and C-436/93 (see ECLI:EU:C:1996:282), this could be legitimate, provided that some standards are being met inter alia, the repackaging doesn’t adversely affect the quality of the goods, there is enough information on the new packaging to identify the reseller, and the new packaging has good quality that respects the brand’s reputation (para. 49,50, 75).Counterfeit goodsLast but not least, a hot topic for… [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
" The Board then looked to the six non-exclusive factors of Section 43(c)(B)(i)-(vi)) to determine whether Hoff's mark is likely to dilute the distinctiveness of opposer's Script Mark. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
L'Oreal argued that the decoded goods did not conform to its quality control standards and differed materially from genuine goods. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:14 am
To the extent consumers may ascribe somewhat different meanings to the marks based upon differences in the definitions of HYDRA and HYDRO, such potential differences are not sufficient to create dissimilar commercial impressions between the marks, particularly given that consumers may also view the marks as having the same meaning.The Board found the marks more similar dissimilar.Conclusion: "[C]onsumers familiar with Registrant’s… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 3:20 am
”To further its point that consumers would read Applicant’s mark as two separate words, the Board relied on Applicant’s own specimen of the mark displaying the letters “L” and the first “C” in larger font (see photo below). [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:01 am
Case C 445/12 P Rivella International AG v OHIM, Baskaya di Baskays Alim E.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
Turning to distinctiveness, the speaker referred to decisions like those in C-265/09 P, C-84/16 P., T-610/21, T-458/21, R 1349/2022-5, and R 362/2023-4. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
According to the judge, when the registered owner of a trade mark consents to another person applying that mark to goods on condition that those goods must not be supplied outside a designated territory, the trade mark owner is not usually regarded as having consented to the application of the mark to goods which the other person knows, when the mark is applied, are to be supplied outside the territory. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
This was followed by an analysis of Case C-324/09 L'Oréal v eBay, and the extent to which an online host of goods sold by third party traders can be required to monitor or take down infringing sites. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:57 am
By way of example, for trade marks:(2) Each of the following is a “permitted purpose”—(a) giving notice that a registered trade mark exists;(b) discovering whether, or by whom, a registered trade mark has been infringed by an act mentioned in section 21A(2)(a), (b) or (c);(c) giving notice that a person has a right in or under a registered trade mark, where another person’s awareness of the right is relevant to any… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
Goodman).Similarity of the goods and trade channels/consumers: Examining Attorney Mark S. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 2:44 am
(i.e., Applicant's service features food that is so good it is meat candy). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The defendant handed the goods over to a delivery company in Italy. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
For example, if a designer assigns a trademark with its name to a third party together with the business operations and goodwill, and the public wrongfully assumes that the designer is still involved in the creation of the goods (CJEU C-259/04 – Elizabeth Emanuel, at paras. 44, 48, 51 and. 53), this does not render the mark misleading unless there is fraudulent intent (C-259/04, at para. 50), Rather, the likelihood of misleading the public must relate to the… [read post]
