Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 421 - 440 of 18,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 7:47 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff further alleges that [defendant] has been accused of infringing patents . . . pertaining to [the falsely marked products]. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 8:29 am
 It then sought to amend its Defence to cover the double identity claim and add a counterclaim for partial revocation on the basis of non-use and/or bad faith. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 2:46 am
In its order, the Board struck opposer's evidence regarding common law rights in its DON Q marks for certain goods (other than rum, the subject of opposer's pleaded registrations) because opposer did not list those alleged rights when it completed the ESTTA cover sheet for this opposition to applicant's Section 66(a) request for extension of protection under the Madrid Protocol. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
A close inspection of this evidence reveals, however, that only five of the use-based registrations cover both doorhardware, and toilets and lavatories. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
OHIM rejected the applications on the grounds that the signs in question referred to a speciality cheese from that country, that they therefore directly described, for the Cypriot public, the characteristics of the goods covered by the applications for trade mark registration, namely the kind and geographical origin of the cheese, milk and milk products applied for, and that those signs were thus necessarily devoid of any distinctive character within the meaning of the regulation… [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The opposing marks covered either identical or similar goods in classes 29 and 30.Both the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal upheld Kraft's claims of likelihood of confusion, since all factors relevant to that end were present in both oppositions, giving due importance to the distinctive character of the earlier rights in the whole EU and the similarity of the signs at issue. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Frolow asked the court to apply a doctrine of "marking estoppel" to prevent Wilson from later arguing that the products are not covered by the patent. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:51 am by John L. Welch
" Dozens of third-party registration for marks covering both guitars and amplifiers suggested that these good are of a type that may emanate from a single source. [read post]
17 May 2019, 10:34 am
A related issue is the practice of some businesses to "evergreen" their marks by repeatedly filing for a new mark covering a broad specification as the five year period draws to an end. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:25 am by James Hamilton
The bill allows covered emerging growth companies to change the tick size of their stock from $.05 to $.10 or from $.10 to $.05 one time during the pilot program. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The allegations were that Nautilus placed patent numbers on its products that didn’t cover those products. [read post]
2 May 2009, 8:32 pm
It later narrwed its identification to cover more closely the mobile communications operating system that it distributes under the ANDORID mark. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
(2) Combination word marks are popular for 'Hollywood' and 'Hollywood Effect' namesCombination word marks including the word ‘Hollywood’ or ‘Bollywood’ are the most popular and more likely to be registered and/or enforced/maintained; only a handful of these marks cover Class 41 or other related Classes such as 38. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 am by Katherine Gundersen
An Early Day Motion calling for the extension of the FOI Act to cover contracted out public services has been tabled by Labour MP Grahame Morris and co-sponsored by Caroline Lucas (Green), Mark Durkan (SDLP), John McDonnell (Lab), Margaret Ritchie (SDLP) and Peter Bottomley (Con):That this House praises the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for the transparency and openness it has brought to the public sector and the public right of access of information held by central and local… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:50 pm
The COVFEFE mark is distinctive, it is not descriptive of the goods covered, and it is not obviously objectionable on the grounds of morality or deception or any other rule of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:50 pm
The COVFEFE mark is distinctive, it is not descriptive of the goods covered, and it is not obviously objectionable on the grounds of morality or deception or any other rule of law. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:00 am by Michael L. Guisti
The boys then came up with a story to explain the mark that was on one of the juveniles face. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:27 am by HL Chronicle of Data Protection
Bret Cohen Mark Brennan             We have extensively covered the California Consumer Privacy Act, the first U.S. law comprehensively regulating the collection, use, and disclosure of general consumers’ personal information in the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am by Guest Barista
It may also prompt more accused infringers to assert false marking claims as a routine counterclaim to an infringement suit where the patentee markets a product allegedly covered by the asserted patent. [read post]