Search for: "Mark McKenna" Results 421 - 440 of 571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2016, 5:48 am by SHG
 Even though they put “bullying” in quotation marks, they offer no definition , no description, no explanation, for what they’re talking about. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:02 am by Laura Appleman
Louis:  Miriam Cherry (McGeorge)  (2010-11)Stanford:   Nita Farahany (Vanderbilt) (Spring 2011); Mark McKenna (Notre Dame) (Fall 2010); Bernadette Meyler (Cornell) (Spring 2011);  Nicholas Rosenkranz (Georgetown) (Fall 2010)**Texas:  Aaron Bruhl (Houston) (Fall 2010); Adam Rosenzweig (Washington Univ.) (2010-11)UC-Berkeley:  Russell Robinson (UCLA) (2010-11)UC-Irvine:  Richard Hasen (Loyola LA) (Spring 2011)UCLA:  Youngjae Lee … [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Katherine Pompilio
Minxin Pei, professor of government at Claremont McKenna College will speak about China’s extensive, sophisticated, and highly effective apparatus to monitor the activities of its population and target, in particular, perceived threats to regime security. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 8:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court here concluded that there were disputed issues of material fact on substantial similarity (and excluded a proposed expert report from Mark McKenna). [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  While Chris argued that he’d only made statements about the Ballin design, not the Ballin mark, the court still found falsity. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
In his fascinating paper on the history of trademark's evolution from state to federal law, Mark McKenna has discussed in detail how post-Lanham Act courts dealt with the challenges of interpretation and allocation of state and federal roles. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Relatedly, jumping off what Mark McKenna & Mark Lemley have written, if a false claim was material to some subset of consumers, those consumers would arguably be a relevant submarket.Anyway, plaintiffs were entitled to discovery in order to substantiate their disparagement claims.Unsurprisingly, Lanham Act claims by the competitor plaintiffs also survived. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark Lemley & Mark McKenna, Breaking the Symmetry Between Utility and Design Patents AKA Design Patents Aren’t Patents (… and it’s a good thing too) Three rules: (1) design patents are judged by patent rules unless statute says otherwise; (2) that which infringes if later anticipates if earlier: there is symmetry b/t infringement and anticipation; (3) infringement in design patent is completely different than infringement in utility patent, which… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: monitoring is a normal part of complete injunction, which says don’t use mark X or anything too similar. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” [Mark Lemley & Mark McKenna may be interested to see that the court cites an antitrust case noting that when a seller’s product is differentiated, seller has “a little pocket of monopoly power. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:33 am by Emma Snell
” Emily Cataneo, Vimal Patel, McKenna Oxenden and Mike Ives report for the New York Times. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Mark McKenna: The Implications of Blackhorse v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
 Mark McKenna has a paper on trademark's trajectory from state to federal-plus-state law, quoted below. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:35 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" Robert Faggen, a Robert Frost scholar and a longtime literature professor at Claremont McKenna, told me, to account for the still healthy enrollment he sees there. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
McKenna has more on the Minneapolis bridge collapse, including pre-collapse warnings; The first suit has already been reported. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
From the defense side, Michael Krauss opines on the subject at Point of Law;Mark McKenna has the story of a $15M verdict from a defective motorcycle tire;And the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dumps a $52M punitive damages verdict in White v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Mark McKenna might like this: “The plaintiffs' novel misrepresentation-by-implication theory is an impermissible work-around of the holding in  Dastar. [read post]