Search for: "Market Merchandisers, Inc." Results 421 - 440 of 544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess,… [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This decision relied substantially on its previous holding in Peoples Department Stores Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
The first week, they will review Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark Int’l, Inc., which also presents a momentous transactional question: When a firm holding a patent sells a product to which the patent applies, does the sale necessarily “exhaust” its rights to enforce the patent as to that product? [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:01 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The court held that Huertas failed to state a NJCFA claim because “the reach of the [NJCFA] is intended to encompass only consumer transactions involving the marketing and sale of merchandise or services. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:20 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The court held that Huertas failed to state a NJCFA claim because “the reach of the [NJCFA] is intended to encompass only consumer transactions involving the marketing and sale of merchandise or services. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 7:22 am by Kristian Soltes
 “You’re talking about an ocean of cash,” and not just in emerging markets, he added. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Building #19, Inc., No. 12-1659, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 85929  (1st Cir. 2013) “[A] trademark holder has no right to police ‘unnecessary’ use of its mark. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:47 am by Cecillia X. Xie and Julie O'Neill
Marketing Practices and Partners The FTC also pointed to HyperBeard’s marketing as evidence that the Apps were child-directed. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:58 am by Ron Coleman
But none of them looks like what I found in the Clifton, New Jersey Acme Market on a recent visit. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:49 am by Ron Coleman
But none of them looks like what I found in the Clifton, New Jersey Acme Market on a recent visit. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
UMG, the copyright owner, used the discs solely for marketing purposes, sending them unsolicited to individuals such as music critics and radio disc jockeys. [read post]