Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 421 - 440
of 14,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
I have previously written (on my own blog) about the meta logic of Hughes v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 9:30 pm
It considers three quite different sources of Entick v Carrington, including one manuscript only recently published, and how that decision has been used to address modern disputes. [read post]
“The strange case of Alito v. Alito; Alito-gate: The justice, his wife, her flags and their ethics.”
29 May 2024, 6:55 pm
” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 3:07 am
Neither of the lead opinions in Matal v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:17 am
The Icelandic Milk and Skyr Corporation v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
Moreover, it is permissible to take into consideration that the mark has always been used in a particular colour in so far as this affects how the mark is perceived by the average consumer. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 3:33 am
How do you think they came out? [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am
V V sought to register the following trade mark in Singapore (the “V V Mark”): However, its application was opposed by Twitter, which relied on its prior registration for the following mark (the “Twitter Mark”). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 3:29 am
Cheryl Cooley v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:37 am
How do you think they came out? [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Under Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova condition ("the BMS conditions"), Condition 5 requires the importer to give notice to the trade mark owner before any repackaged product is put on sale, and, on demand, supplies him with a specimen. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
What followed was (in my view) a straightforward trade mark infringement, but what is interesting is how Feel Good achieved its mischief. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Curll, Stowe v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The case is important to an understanding of how the immunities in Art 14 of the EC E-Commerce Directive operate in relation to "web 2.0" or user generated content sites. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:02 am
How would you rule? [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:01 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
Nintendo of America, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
But on the narrow issue of conservative v. something else--well, kudos to Mark for trying. [read post]
