Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:28 pm
United States, No. 08-67, at this link. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
The Library of Congress has posted its Constitution Day event, a September 14, 2022, conversation between Mark V. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:22 am
Supreme Court significantly narrowed the definition of “waters of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 pm
From the Journal of Accountancy: The United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a Tax Court decision and upheld a Treasury regulation that sets a two-year statute of limitation on claims for innocent spouse relief (Jones v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:17 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Bryant v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
First, with regard to acquiescence, section 48 of the Trade Marks Act of 1994 states the following: “(1) Where the proprietor of an earlier trade mark or other earlier right has acquiesced for a continuous period of five years in the use of a registered trade mark in the United Kingdom, being aware of that use, there shall cease to be any entitlement on the basis of that earlier trade mark or other right— to apply for… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had to determine if JobDiva Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had to determine if JobDiva Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:42 am
United States … to the splintered opinion in Freeman v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
Long-standing precedent makes clear that Trademark Act Section 2(d) provides two separate bases for refusal, one being a mark registered in the USPTO and the other being a mark (or trade name) previously used in the United States and not abandoned, and that the requirement of priority of use applies only to unregistered marks asserted as a bar to registration. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
