Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
Strange news surfaced this week regarding the Justice Department's case against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
On Tuesday, the Justices took the cases of Christie v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
In the United States, the practice of sovereign immunity, developed in the early 19th century, was originally governed by State Department recommendations, which were informed by international custom. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
In other Public Defender news, the 9th Circuit blog has a post entitled "Gonzales: DOJ agrees Ninth Circuit precedent on minor offenses is flawed" and that the Department of Justice has conceded that the Ninth Circuit should grant rehearing en banc to correct United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:40 pm
And the Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
United States, the Court held that if a police officer has probable cause to make an arrest (or reasonable suspicion for a stop), then there is no Fourth Amendment violation, even if the officer's real reason for the arrest (or stop) would not satisfy the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
But the 80-year-old Gaylor marked a first Wednesday when a lawsuit she brought was heard by the United States Supreme Court....Two others from Wisconsin have high-profile roles in the litigation.Jay F. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
He concludes that “Americans don’t agree on when the amendment was approved, and, I am sure, some in their hearts believe it should not bind the United States today. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am
United States, the “rails to trails” case. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
In marked departures from the original order, the revised E.O. clarifies that its provisions are restricted to those outside the United States who did not have a valid visa on or after January 27, 2017; permits consular officers to grant waivers on a case-by-case basis; eliminates the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees; and eliminates the preferential treatment provision. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
” Because the President’s travel ban is not “bona fide,” the court privileged cable news hits from Rudolph Giuliani and Stephen Miller over official statements of the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, to conclude that the policy was in fact animated by animus. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
The justices agreed in late October to take up their case along with the Biden administration’s challenge to the law, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
