Search for: "Marks v. United States of America"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am
In Marks on behalf of SM v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
Law Review (1960) QUESTION: This year marks the 100th anniversary of the first Supreme Court decisions interpreting the freedoms of speech and the press. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:13 am
As to Section 1746, an unsworn declaration must be "substantially in the following form:"I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that the court declined to take up a case that “involved the right of public unions in many states to be the exclusive representative for all employees in a bargaining unit, and whether nonmembers have First Amendment speech and associational interests in not being represented if they object. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” In the latest episode of SCOTUStalk (podcast), Mark Walsh joins Amy Howe to discuss last week’s oral argument in Iancu v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
The application date was 30 October 2016, a day before Trump International Limited was incorporated, and less than three months before the inauguration of Donald Trump as President of the United States of America. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Holmes was such a well-known wit that he suffered from the Mark Twain or Winston Churchill syndrome of having just about any commonplace witty saying of the day attributed to him. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
They worried so much about a president acting for personal financial gain, rather than exclusively for the interests of the United States, that they forbid it in the Constitution three times. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, may relate to challenges to the president’s authority to declare a national emergency allowing construction of a border wall. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
(Foreign investment in Cuba might be at risk if U.S. allows lawsuits over confiscated property)Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/cuba/article221222875.html#storylink=cpy)The always complicated relations between the United States and Cuba has become more complicated in recent days. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 10:08 am
(The Ninth, to its great credit, doesn’t know either).United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
United States, in which the justices considered whether a period of pretrial imprisonment can toll a term of federal supervised release, comes from Fiona Doherty. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
United States Postal Service, which asks whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act, comes from Ronald Mann. [read post]
