Search for: "Martin v. Williams" Results 421 - 440 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
As a result of this judgment, Martin claims that his rights were violated when the trial court failed to conduct a Faretta (Faretta v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
As a result of this judgment, Martin claims that his rights were violated when the trial court failed to conduct a Faretta (Faretta v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am by David Pocklington
Ecclesiastical lawyers will perhaps be more familiar with Martin v Mackonochie, Law Reports, Privy Council Appeal, Cases, 1867-9, pp. 386 to 392, and Mackonochie v Lord Penzance (1881) 6 App Cas 424. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm by Ben Vernia
Martin, 796 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2015), which rejected the application of the “government benefits” provision in such cases; and a Third Circuit decision, U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:53 pm by S2KM Limited
Legislative Update NSSTA - Eric Vaughn: Washington Update SSP - Roy Franco: HR 1063 Government Benefits NSSTA MSA Panel -Toni Warbington; Doug Brand; David Korch; David Hayes Special Needs Trusts - Jay Sangerman SSP Liability MSAs - Jason Lazarus; Roy Franco; Mark Pololizio; Doug Shaw Liens Panel - Roy Franco; Tevra Johnson Recommended resources S2P2J Chapter 15 - "Government Benefits and Structured Settlements" S2 wiki - "Government Benefits" … [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am by William Gould
   Perhaps significantly, at one point Kennedy remarked to William Messenger, counsel for respondent Martin Mulhall, that Mulhall’s position seemed to be at odds with “well accepted practices and understandings” — i.e., presumably the practice of neutrality agreement negotiation along with Supreme Court precedents approving of compulsory union recognition when a secret ballot box election was not present. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
First Amendment Expansionism, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2015, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2015-36. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
In Wong v Aripin [2011] WASC 174 Kenneth Martin J in the Supreme Court of Western Australia struck out certain parts of a claim based on words spoken in a foreign language to two persons. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]