Search for: "Marvin v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Solis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:54 pm
The recent case of Stansberry v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 2:02 pm
” Board member Marvin Kaplan dissented from the measure. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:39 am
Department of Justice, multiple states' attorneys' general and international antitrust regulators, most obviously the E.U. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:45 am
Sweeney, who presided over the month-long trial that ended on July 17.The Court of Appeal's 2005 decision in State Farm v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The legal question for the court in Devorah H. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
& Com. 741-773 (2010).ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.Bynum, Marvin C. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Rick Georges considers whether Wolfram Alpha is a reliable, albeit less intelligent, substitute for Marvin or that other paranoid entity, Google. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Rick Georges considers whether Wolfram Alpha is a reliable, albeit less intelligent, substitute for Marvin or that other paranoid entity, Google. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
