Search for: "Matter of B M and P M" Results 421 - 440 of 1,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am by Michael Lowe
From the Guideline, here is the complete Loss Table: (1) If the loss exceeded $6,500, increase the offense level as follows: Loss (apply the greatest) Increase in Level (A) $6,500 or less no increase (B) More than $6,500 add 2 (C) More than $15,000 add 4 (D) More than $40,000 add 6 (E) More than $95,000 add 8 (F) More than $150,000 add 10 (G) More than $250,000 add 12 (H) More than $550,000 add 14 (I) More than $1,500,000 add 16 (J) More than $3,500,000 add 18 (K) More than $9,500,000 add… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
[redacted: harm to ongoing matter] while Trump and Gates were driving to LaGuardia Airport. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm by Vishnu Kannan
Department of Homeland Security; Charles M. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Clocktower Law LLC (Clocktower) conducts conflict-of-interest checks for each new client. b. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[I’m thinking of the work showing variations in the ultimatum game based both on demographics and on perceived desert through specific performance on a task.] [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am by Unknown
§ 28-14-4(b).West Virginia: If the policy is silent on the matter, vacation has to be paid out at the end of employment. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:19 am
(I don’t believe these therapies are roughly equivalent in their powers of healing to each other, in other words, that it matters little which kind of therapy one chooses. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"); id. 2.8(B) ("A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, … court staff, … and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity …. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
But the dispositive legal issues in the case may have ramifications that go beyond the employment context because they involve matters of common-law contract law; specifically, the element of a meeting of the minds in the absence of a formal written contract executed by both parties. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
[Y] by order of SPDC and / or a representative of SPDC attended the meeting (s) where these witnesses had to prepare / sign the statements prepared by others and / or [b.] [read post]