Search for: "Matter of Barry V."
Results 421 - 440
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 8:31 am
’s majority decision in Semelhago v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
Magistrate Judge Barry S. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
Magistrate Judge Barry S. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently… [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the position of Barry George, who, along with JUSTICE, was granted permission to intervene). [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
Cormier, Andrew Good, Barry C. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady police officers. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
Southworth, and Johanns v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:27 am
Berry v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
For example, R. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
Barry (1988) 485 U.S. 312, 322.) [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
Yes,” said Barry Helfand, Kim’s attorney. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Birmingham argued that under Part VII Housing Act 1996 generally and indeed under the 1999 Regulations, matters of procedure were usually a matter for the Local Authority. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Birmingham argued that under Part VII Housing Act 1996 generally and indeed under the 1999 Regulations, matters of procedure were usually a matter for the Local Authority. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
In the appeal of Rebecca DuPerry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm
Texas v. [read post]
