Search for: "Matter of Brown" Results 421 - 440 of 9,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
S. 543 (1976), concern racial profiling in law enforcement of brown people along the U.S. southern border. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am by Amy Howe
He explained that Colorado cannot “force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Tom Smith
"Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance," Gorsuch added.Gorsuch's majority opinion was joined by the court's Republican-appointed justices, while liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm by Ilya Somin
None of this matters much if you think universities should be given broad discretion to use racial preferences, so long as it is for seemingly good motives. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
One is “quid pro quo” corruption, such as the proverbial brown paper bag filled with cash handed over to the politician to have them vote a certain way. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed; she would instead have dismissed the case as improvidently granted. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
In their dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Sotomayor rejected the majority’s approach and said the court should have struck down the law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
But the trial court here took judicial notice of the truth of disputed factual matters. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am by Noam Biale
It does not matter that an intervening decision of this Court confirms his innocence. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
How Local Officials Seek Revenge on Their Hometown Newspapers Yahoo News – Emily Flitter (New York Times) | Published: 6/18/2023 In most of the country, state and local laws require public announcements – about town meetings, elections, and dozens of other routine occurrences – to be published in newspapers, as well as online, so citizens are aware of matters of public note. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Thomas cited last year's decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
However, average blended rates (the rates charged for entire matters rather than individual timekeepers) remained relatively flat. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
In the words of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, written while she was on the district court, it leads to a world in which “the Legislature and the Judiciary are both hopelessly stymied when it comes to addressing alleged abuses by the Executive Branch, such that, ultimately, the President wields virtually unchecked power. [read post]