Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 421 - 440
of 482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2008, 1:32 pm
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 9:05 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 6:32 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment . [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
So, as a matter of sheer historical accuracy, Scalia was probably wrong in suggesting that the Second Amendment had anything to do with safeguarding a right of self-defense. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
The answer is partly a matter of association. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:59 pm
The precise combination is also a matter of great dispute. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:30 am
Law Offices of Barry Levinson v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:14 am
I agree that civility can come at the cost of sincere and forceful argument about things that matter. [read post]
8 May 2008, 10:03 pm
For example, see the posts of Brian Tamanaha and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 am
The Jack Balkin (our generous host) who, along with Sandy Levinson, articulates a descriptive theory of the development of constitutional law as largely a matter of "partisan entrenchment" appears to be in tension with the Jack Balkin who is building a version of originalism as a prescriptive theory of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:25 am
The comments, especially those by Kevin Jon Heller (pointing out that he pitched a review to Michigan, and asking whether Griffin has actually tried to review any of the books he mentions) and Sandy Levinson (arguing that all law reviews are displaying a sad decline in the number of book reviews they run) are especially interesting. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:22 am
Levinson's probability/magnitude test. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:18 pm
Levinson. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Opposition to MDPs The strongest and most persuasive argument against the MDP is that the American Bar Association (or ABA) opposes it, voting overwhelmingly against them in their last meeting addressing the matter. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 3:02 am
Party operatives, pundits, and politicians are used to changing their arguments about structural matters (Presidential power, federalism, judicial restraint) on a dime, with few worries about consistency over time. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 9:25 am
Unlike most other critics of the Constitution, however, Levinson is not content in merely presenting a litany of democratic complaints and leaving the matter there. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:10 pm
My colleague Sandy Levinson asked me whether Roger Clemens got a raw deal. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:17 am
Professors Jack Balkin (Yale) and Sanford Levinson (U of Texas) have posted "Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship" (Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 121; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 109, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities Vol. 18, p. 155, 2006) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Infinitec Southwest Assistive Technology Exchange Network (ATEN) Adult Day Services & Programs 7550 West 183rd Street Tinley Park, IL 60477 Phone: (708) 444-8460; (800) 476-2836 (Toll Free) Fax: (708) 429-3981 Trutter Center Adult Services Program 3145 South 55th Avenue Cicero, IL 60804 Phone: (708) 863-1186 Fax: (708) 863-1189 Infinitec West Arthur & Mary Rubloff Building 826 South Addison Street Villa Park, IL 60181 Phone: (630) 620-4433 Adult Day Services & Progams… [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
Finally, my own personal experience as an entry-level differed from Levinson's view that that it matters to schools "not at all" what law firm (if any) you worked at. [read post]
