Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh"
Results 421 - 440
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am
Cases considered included: R v IAT, ex p Bakhtaur Singh [1986] 1 WLR 910; Soering v UK [1989] 11 EHRR 439; Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11; AS (Pakistan) v SSHD [2008] EWCA Civ 1118; EB (Kosovo) v SSHD [2008] UKHL 41; JO (Uganda) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 10]. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Berkoff v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Read more: Previous posts on libel and defamation Hardeep Singh libel case reignites debate on place of religion in the English courts Libel reform debate hots up as new Government takes advice on reform [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:16 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Inevitably, however, when the subject matter on which one focuses reflects one perspective only any response thereto tends to present as antithetical. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:52 pm
Relying on Niranjan Singh Karam Singh v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
”, taking up the familiar themes from the Simon Singh and Peter Wilmshurst cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The Simon Singh case – one of the catalysts for the campaign – is illustrative. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
But as Dr Chaplin argues, the ambit of “religion” and for that matter “doctrine” is wide and often fuzzy at the edges. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
The claimant in the case of HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group ([2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)) is seeking permission to appeal the decision of Mr Justice Eady staying the action because a trial would require the court to decide matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:18 am
In Keshub Mahindra v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor [2010] EWHC 1294 (QB) (17 May 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has effectively thrown out a libel action against a journalist who claimed in an article that a Sikh holy man was a “cult leader”. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:12 pm
Singh, 2000 BCCA 94. [61] Each case must, of course, be assessed on its own facts. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
Writing in the Guardian Simon Singh welcomes the decision. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
See Doherty v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
It was not very long ago that courts were enjoined to base their determination on whether a certain position or tenet was a matter of spiritual belief (so as to attract the protection of Article 9) by the degree of sincerity with which it was held: see, for example, R(on the application of Sarika Watkins-Singh) v Aberdare Girls High School Governers (Defendant) and Rhondda Cynon Taf Unitory Authority and our comment on it. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
The recent Simon Singh libel case, although eventually resolved in Dr Singh’s favour, showed how tenuous the protection of free speech can be under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:40 pm
It is doubtful whether the an Irish Court would have reached the same decision as the recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Singh in the light of this guidance. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
Karampal Singh Nakal, 2010 WL 1254836 (California Court of Appeals 2010). [read post]
