Search for: "Matter of Steven C." Results 421 - 440 of 1,336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:17 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 2305.09(C) (An action for fraud “shall be brought within four years after the cause thereof accrued. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:49 am by Anushka Limaye
.: The American Enterprise Institute will host a discussion with Steven Cook, Melissa Dalton and Karen E. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Severability, the courts have long held, is basically a matter of statutory construction. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Given the interconnectedness of the internet, the FCC says, it would be impossible as a practical matter for ISPs to comply with California’s net neutrality law with respect to California customers only. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya’s Data Matters blog has provided useful context on this matter. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
His antitrust opinions, certain other competition matters, and a closely related dispute over the Obama net neutrality rule betray an ideological, anti-regulatory activist, willing to take bits and pieces of precedent and use them to change the law as he likes. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At most, the Lewinsky evidence was modestly relevant in the Jones case: proof that Clinton had an affair with an intern has some bearing on whether Clinton is the sort of person who uses the power of his office for sexual gratification.If the Jones case arose today, questions like those proposed in Kavanaugh’s 1998 memo would be clearly disallowed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b), which limits discovery (including depositions) to matters that are both relevant to a claim or… [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[But why does that mean it should matter to the fair use analysis?] [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
Swingle believed the matters he published were true because anonymous individuals on the Internet said they were, and he believed those individuals were Gibson acting incognito. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” But in an op-ed for NBC News, Danny Cavallos argues that “[c]ontrary to what many commentators and Democrats are saying, Roe v. [read post]