Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 421 - 440
of 19,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 1:23 pm
Just ask one of the 90’s most popular R&B singers Toni Braxton, who has now filed for bankruptcy twice in the past 15 years. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
b. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
Louboutin is a great case b/c it’s so odd compared to the rest of US TM law. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Ultimately I think it’s content based b/c deceptiveness criterion isn’t black and white, when you look at the actual test. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am
The first intervener invoked the grounds for opposition pursuant to Article 100(a), (b) and (c) EPC. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
S., to transfer the appeal fee. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 am
By: Scott B. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 8:34 pm
After all, the FBI handled the shipping, the defendants didn’t direct the agents to ship the guns to the U.S., and – as a matter of law – the agents could not violate the substantive statutes. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
For that matter, under the decision's fiduciary rationale, wouldn't Littman have the same right to recover the "true value" of his interest even if there had never been a subsequent third-party sale? [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:40 am
T hok v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
In November 2008, the Liberals and the NDP agreed to form an executive coaltion (to share cabinet positions), with a promise by the Bloc Québécois not to move non-confidence for 18 months, if the Conservatives lost an expected non-confidence vote (non-confidence in the Prime Minister’s economic plan). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
T 2526/11, Reasons, point 2.2).4. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
T 2526/11, Reasons, point 2.2).4. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
What is “only by A or by B” supposed to mean? [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
McGregor, a combination b/t traders from which someone was excluded. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:20 pm
Not just because T. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
(my emphasis) There was agreement on the fact that the subject-matter of this claim was not explicitly disclosed in the application as filed, but the applicant pointed out that the disclosure was implicit.The Board won’t have it:[7] The appellant does not contest the absence of an explicit disclosure of the subject-matter of claim 1 […] in the application as filed, but its argumentation relies on an implicit disclosure of this subject-matter which, in… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:28 am
AT&T Mobility, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility et al, 2-16-cv-01374 (TXED July 15, 2017, Order) (Payne, MJ) [read post]
