Search for: "Mazie"
Results 421 - 440
of 778
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
" Steven Mazie has this post at the "Democracy in America" blog of The Economist. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie reports on the pivotal role Justice Anthony Kennedy will likely play in several high-profile cases on the Supreme Court’s docket for October Term 2017. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that the Supreme Court’s entry-ban ruling on Wednesday was “a win for family members in Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Syria and Yemen seeking visas to visit relatives in America,” but “a loss for resettlement organisations that have already expended time, resources and energy planning for 24,000 aspiring refugees seeking shelter in America,” and that the court’s “above-the-fray perspective is the handiwork of a… [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie observes that the “paper-and-ink volley” in the parties’ briefs was not “fought in polite, lawyerly terms. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
Additional coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Julia Edwards Ainsley and Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Richard Wolf at USA Today, and Steven Mazie in The Economist. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that “one salvo” in the Democrats’ battle “to stanch the huge redistricting advantage Republicans grabbed after the 2010 census” “is coming to the Supreme Court when the justices reconvene in the autumn: Gill v Whitford, a case challenging Wisconsin’s electoral maps. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
Senators Chris Coons (D-DE), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) introduced the STRONGER Patents Act of 2017 with the goal of strengthening the U.S. patent system by making it easier and cheaper for patent holders to enforce their patents. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at how “the justices spend their three months of summer break,” concluding that as Roberts has observed, “the summer recess isn’t just about giving the justices a break from resolving the republic’s most pressing legal controversies—the adjournment reassures Americans that the ‘constitution is safe for the summer. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at the recently concluded Supreme Court term, calling it “a year of comity. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:15 am
Mazie Hirono (D-HI). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie also reports on the implications of the decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
At The Washington Post, Darla Cameron and Kim Soffen analyze the court’s ruling, as does Steven Mazie in The Economist. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” Additional looks at the business pending before the court come from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, and Constitution Daily. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Mazie is Professor of Political Studies at Bard and Supreme Court Correspondent for The Economist. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that Matal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that “the justices have looked the other way when oddly drawn districts clump voters based on party rather than race,” and that “[i]f the challenge to hyper-partisan line-drawing succeeds, the shape of districts to come may tighten the link between voters’ preferences and who gets elected. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:20 pm
" Steven Mazie had this post at the "Democracy in America" blog of The Economist back on February 21, 2017. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:45 am
" Steven Mazie has this post at the "Democracy in America" blog of The Economist. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that by “leaving the First Amendment matter off to one side, the Ninth Circuit gave the Supreme Court a possible path to uphold the stays on Mr Trump’s bans without causing undue constitutional drama” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps agrees that the 9th Circuit’s decision offered the justices “a map of an escape route, if they care to take it. [read post]
