Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 421 - 440 of 821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2016, 8:52 am by WIMS
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-OK), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI.) and House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield (R-KY), 34 Senators and 171 House Members filed an amicus brief today in the case of State of West Virginia, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Pastor McConnell gave evidence as to his background and stated he became a Christian at the age of 8 and had been a full time preacher for 60 years. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 11:12 am by Steve Lubet
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced that the "vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 3:29 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court’s recent holding in NLRB v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:35 pm by Cody M. Poplin
” The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court heard arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:13 am by DJWard
Caterpillar Tractor Co., and the Fourth District Court of Appeals in 2006, McConnell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
This decision, The Clorox Company Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]