Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy"
Results 421 - 440
of 571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
McCoy, 100 N.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
McCoy, 100 N.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:13 am
Battaglia v Grillo 2012 NY Slip Op 31588(U) June 6, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 014807-10 Judge: Vito M. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Harbison or McCoy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am
More specifically, the continuous representation doctrine “applies only where there is ‘a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d at 784, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on McCoy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States: Standard for the court of appeals to correct a plain error; McCoy v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:08 am
Because crocheting is so Lochner v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:40 am
It's written by Brad Heath and Kevin McCoy. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:19 am
A sample, from Washington v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:43 pm
McCoy. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Asset forfeiture was a component of U.S.A. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
The doctrine tolls the limitations period "where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim" (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306), and " where the continuing representation pertains specifically to [*2][that] matter' " (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d 1512, 1513, quoting Shumsky v Eisenstein,… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
McCoy Hilliard & Parks, 346 N.C. 650, 660, 488 S.E.2d 215, 220-21 (1997). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
"McCoy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
On December 1, in Perez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
See, e.g., Tibor, 1999 ND 150, ¶ 26, 598 NW.2d 480 ("modern transportation reduces the measure of distance from days to hours, and instant communication is available through phone and cable links"); McCoy v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages ***” ( Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Cox, 93 AD3d 639, 640 [2d Dept 2012]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295… [read post]
