Search for: "Mcdonnell, Appeal of" Results 421 - 440 of 610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2007, 8:27 pm
Dailey was a member of the 2006 class of summer associates at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:47 pm by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court stated that the McDonnell-Douglas framework could be adapted to the facts of this case, and the employees only had to show that older employees were terminated while younger employees were retained or hired. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Any other interpretation would be contrary to the McDonnell-Douglas framework, which requires knowledge, actual or constructive, of discriminatory intent for there to be liability. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 am by Joe May
National: Dennis Hastert Sentenced to 15 Months, and Apologizes for Sex AbuseNew York Times – Monica Davey, Julie Bosman, and Mitch Smith | Published: 4/27/2016 A judge sentenced former U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm by Paul A. Prados
  This injunction can still be appealed, but it is likely no longer subject to revision by the three judge court. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:55 am by SHG
In this age of rage, many are appealing for us to simply put the law aside and “just do it” like this is some impulse-buy Nike sneaker. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
 Any count based on Trump’s speech would likely be overturned on appeal. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit first found that the rationale for the cat’s paw theory applies equally to FMLA retaliation claims as to other types of employment discrimination and retaliation claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 2:50 pm by Andrew Hudson
While there is no immediate right of appeal to the HC, disputes under the Act will often raise issues of sufficient importance to support the grant of special leave to appeal to the HC. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that it has not yet addressed whether the temporal proximity between an employer learning of a plaintiff’s pregnancy and the challenged employment action can be sufficient to prove pretext, the appeals court observed that in the context of other employment discrimination claims, it has held that while suspicious timing may be evidence of pretext under McDonnell Douglas, such “[t]iming standing alone is not sufficient absent other evidence. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:33 pm by Joy Waltemath
Because there was direct evidence of discrimination, the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting framework was unnecessary. [read post]