Search for: "Mohamed v. Mohamed"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1-4 February 2016. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm
Upon return, David Nevin, counsel for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, adds two points. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:48 pm
In addition, at least in this lawtel note, the approach taken to R v Camden ex P Mohammed seems, well, cursory at best. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:11 pm
Salek, Faith inspiration in a secular world: An Islamic perspective on humanitarian principles Abdulfatah Said Mohamed & Ronald Ofteringer, “Rahmatan lil-'alamin” (A mercy to all creation): Islamic voices in the debate on humanitarian principles Kathryn Kraft, Faith and impartiality in humanitarian response: Lessons from Lebanese evangelical churches providing food aid Mohd Hisham Mohd Kamal, Is neutral humanitarian action permissible under Islamic law? [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:24 am
See Jawad v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1-4 February 2016. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1-4 February 2016. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
The district court stayed Warfaa’s case pending the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1-4 February 2016. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:03 am
Criddle, Customary Constraints on the Use of Force: Article 51 with an American Accent Anne-Charlotte Martineau, Concerning Violence: A Post-Colonial Reading of the Debate on the Use of Force International Law and Practice Ria Mohammed-Davidson, Show Me the Money: Enforcing Original Jurisdiction Judgments of the Caribbean Court of Justice Friedrich Rosenfeld, Arbitral Praeliminaria – Reflections on the Distinction between Admissibility and Jurisdiction after BG v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:05 am
Major, Religion and Law in R v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
On Monday 1 February 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor concerning whether HM armed forces had the power to detain the appellants, on the ground that it was necessary for imperative reasons of security, pursuant to International Humanitarian Law applicable in a non-international armed conflict. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:52 am
Another interesting case is the conjoined appeals of Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor concerning whether HM armed forces had the power to detain the appellants, on the ground that it was necessary for imperative reasons of security, pursuant to International Humanitarian Law applicable in a non-international armed conflict. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
The last case in this category I want to look at is the Spycatcher trial (HM Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers). [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
” There was apparently no consideration of the Mohammed principles (R (Mohammed) v Camden LBC [1997] 30 HLR 315 – (a) the merits of the substantive case, (b) whether there was new material on review that could effect the decision, (c) the personal circumstances of the applicant.). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:54 am
Miller, Mohammed A. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
” Mohamed Abdullahi Hassan joined al Shabaab in 2008 and is among some 22 Minnesota men who have travelled to Somalia to join the group since 2007. [read post]
