Search for: "Myers v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2018, 11:27 am
After comparing the two articles that analyze Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
Two of them — Myers v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
In the case of McDaid v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 6:13 am
Dist.c v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:53 pm
The first was in Myers v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:18 am
Like monarchy or Pennoyer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:17 am
Additional Resources: Baptist Health System, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:17 am
Additional Resources: Baptist Health System, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
In Abood v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
In Givhan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
The agency’s argument that the regulation leaves the decision up to the employer was unavailing, the court explained, under the competitor standing doctrine and had already been rejected in earlier cases, such as Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
The Supreme Court has never squarely addressed the point under the Appointments Clause, but in discussing presidential removal power in Myers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 7:53 am
Additional Resources: Painter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers,… [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm
I’d be willing to wager that a sizeable majority would have said that Humphrey’s Executor was wrong, and that we should go back to the rule in Myers v. [read post]
