Search for: "Newspaper Holdings, Inc." Results 421 - 440 of 916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Second, there was the important data protection decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation The government will consult on tax breaks for local newspapers, it was announced by George Osborne in his budget speech. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Hyde, 2015 ONSC 1053 http://t.co/n4pGQVloxo -> Anton Piller order issued in trade secret case, TSI International Group Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Electronic Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2013), which holds that such works are protected from trademark law claims, counsels in favor of the same result in right of publicity cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), did not involve speech by individual students but instead dealt with governmental book removal choices and school newspaper editorial decisions tied to the curriculum. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc., 59 Cal.4th 522 (2014), decided in late June 2014. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Google ([2015] EWHC 59 (QB)), the Court judge an application brought by Google to strike out a claim brought by Mr Mosley under sections 10, 13 and 14 of the Data Protection Act 1998, holding at [55] that it was “a viable claim which raises questions of general public interest, which ought to proceed to trial”. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
  These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
 Among other things, newspapers or other parties that are not "data processors" are not subject to the same obligation and so the law readily allows publicity with regard to the exact same information.[12] This decision provided controversial, to say the least.[13]  One reason the decision is controversial is that while the court acknowledges there are balances to be drawn in the case of certain data, it nonetheless officially intervenes in the distribution of… [read post]