Search for: "O'Connor v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
  Absent a connection to the employment decision, stray remarks likely do not suffice as evidence, as noted by Justice OConnor in her concurring opinion in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm by Josh Blackman
I have to imagine he has Judge Reed O'Connor in mind, but there are probably other recent appointees in the club. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Shortly before the Hamdan decision, Justice OConnor told us that Quirin is the law today. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:42 pm
Like Justice O'Connor, Justice Kennedy's commitment to any ideological world view is too fragile for either wing of the Court to have genuine confidence in the outcome of an entire Term's worth of cases. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
 That Justice O'Connor announced a federalism canon in 1991 (or the Court applied similar ones in other cases from that time period) hardly provides support for the originalist bona fides of the canon. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, said that she has never seen a time when the judiciary was subject to such universal criticism. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by carie
But he was willing to give up the opinion-writing in other major cases -- to O'Connor on affirmative action, to Kennedy on gay rights -- to preserve a majority. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm by carie
But he was willing to give up the opinion-writing in other major cases -- to O'Connor on affirmative action, to Kennedy on gay rights -- to preserve a majority. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
 And an odd lineup, which usually means something interesting was going on in the case:  Ginsburg joined by Stevens, Scalia, Souter, and Kennedy in the majority; Blackmun, Rehnquist, OConnor, and Thomas in dissent). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
Justice Stevens dissented (as did CJ Rehnquist and Justices White and O'Connor). [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
But Wittes states:';Dudziak's implicit argument seems to me altogether perverse. [read post]