Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES."
Results 421 - 440
of 1,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
In order to explain the problem, Justice Polston, writes an opinion in which Justice Canady concurs. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
s stance as a result of a July 1996 meeting at the White House, at which ACOG representatives told administration officials ? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Although Texas held elections in 2014 and 2016 under the 2013 plans, in 2017, the Texas court found defects in several of the districts in the 2011 federal congressional and State House plans (the State Senate plan is not at issue here). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Although Texas held elections in 2014 and 2016 under the 2013 plans, in 2017, the Texas court found defects in several of the districts in the 2011 federal congressional and State House plans (the State Senate plan is not at issue here). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
In the House, there are 9 representatives over the age of 80—some elected as far back as 1973, the most recent elected in 1999. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm
Justice Barrett is new, but Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been serving on the SCOTUS for some time already and they're going to look at the issue, not the party. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:22 pm
And we do anticipate they're going to talk about her years at the White House, a couple of years, and her time as dean at the Harvard Law School.To what extent, Marcia, though, is this criticism that she's inexperienced likely to stick, because, as several of the senators pointed out, a third of the justices who have ever sat on the Supreme Court had no judicial background? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:32 am
In the case of the Nunes memo, only the “Gang of Eight” congressional leaders and a handful of others out of the 435 members of the House of Representatives and the 100 members of the Senate reportedly had access to the underlying FISA surveillance applications and unredacted FISC opinions. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
House of Representatives and the Senate already have determined that Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 “warrants … disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:33 am
Last week, the Obama administration testified in support for the bill, and Senator Feinstein has confirmed that she intends to work with the House of Representatives on pushing her bill in January 2014. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 11:07 pm
That title may be bestowed only upon the winner in the Electoral College vote of December 18, or if not there, then upon the candidate selected by the new House of Representatives that convenes on January 3, 2021. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:11 pm
That title may be bestowed only upon the winner in the Electoral College vote of December 18, or if not there, then upon the candidate selected by the new House of Representatives tha [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:17 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 2:14 pm
A criminally immune president can obstruct justice in any investigation that could lead to his impeachment, perhaps even bribing representatives not to impeach him and manipulating senators not to convict him. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 3:15 pm
At least until January 2023, and quite possibly even after that date, Republicans will possess a majority of the seats in the Texas House and Senate. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Before the Senate could hold confirmation hearings, however, William Rehnquist died, and Roberts was re-designated as Bush 43’s nominee for chief justice. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
Here, regardless of rigor, our conclusion is straightforward because the Members—29 Senators and 186 Members of the House of Representatives—do not constitute a majority of either body and are, therefore, powerless to approve or deny the President's acceptance of foreign emoluments. . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
As the document itself indicated, it contained evidence that was “within the primary jurisdiction of the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary in its present investigation to determine whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach Richard M. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:44 pm
At the very least, let’s hope this bill gets through the Senate floor with as much support as it had in the House of Representatives. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
In his swing vote opinion, Chief Justice Roberts agreed that this would indeed be unconstitutional, but revised the statute by giving it a “saving construction” in which the “requirement” was turned into an option to buy insurance, and the “penalty” was converted from a fine to a tax. [read post]
